Recent Updates

 

09/11/2025 12:00 PM

Why are designers so obsessed with 'challenging' styling?

 

09/11/2025 12:00 PM

GWM Ora Cat revealed as crossover sibling to 03 hatchback

 

09/11/2025 12:00 PM

Industry plans for new small, affordable car class backed by EU

 

09/11/2025 12:00 AM

Competition: Win two nights in Paris courtesy of Renault

 

09/10/2025 12:00 PM

Munich Motor Show, 94mpg Audi A2 and saving the car industry

 

09/10/2025 12:00 PM

BMW 1 Series

 

09/10/2025 12:00 PM

MG 3 suffers 'critical safety failure' in Euro NCAP crash test

 

09/10/2025 12:00 AM

Skoda seven-seat EV due in 2026 as brand's new flagship

 

09/10/2025 12:00 AM

Ferrari Testarossa returns as 1035bhp SF90 replacement

 

09/10/2025 12:00 AM

RML GT Hypercar driven: Is this 907bhp monster the ultimate 911?

<<    1   2   3   4   5   >>

EV, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Solar & more 21st century mobility!

< Prev    of 6895   Next >
Why are designers so obsessed with 'challenging' styling?
Thursday, Sep 11, 2025 12:00 PM
Bentley EXP 15 concept Bentley can’t have been surprised by the reaction to its EXP 15 that was revealed a few months ago

Ever see something online and sigh and think that you know what the comments are going to be like? That’s how I felt when I saw the studio pictures of the Bentley EXP 15 concept car.

I feel like I could have told them. And while I know that what people say on social media is not a true representation of what the public thinks, especially those who can afford a Bentley, there is enough ‘Jaguar-lite’ and ‘yikes’ sentiment to see that this is a challenging car.

Bentley must have known that, mustn’t it? The EXP 15 is not set for production but that doesn’t mean it won’t inform the cars Bentley will make in future.

The company has form here: remember the EXP 9 F from the 2012 Geneva motor show? It was not exactly a looker, was not widely gracefully received, and while not destined for production in that form, it did preview the Bentayga, which arrived looking even worse.

‘Challenging’ seems to be a word of the moment. Even Julian Thomson, the General Motors designer who has created some truly beautiful cars, used it in our interview with him last month.

Designs, he thought, should challenge; although he works in an advanced design studio so he has more reason to believe that, and there’s nothing ungainly about his studio’s latest Corvette concept. But designers today do seem to like cars that are challenging. They like dissonance. Why?

Clearly it’s a choice. Car designers know what beautiful is because they’ve studied it, and they’re beautiful people with beautiful lives, houses, dogs and partners, and they can pull off wearing suits with trainers.

When it comes to dating apps and sessions on Rightmove, are they swiping yes on ugly people and houses because they’d like to be challenged? Because it doesn’t seem so.

So why the challenge when it comes to cars? Why should a car be difficult to look at? An argument goes that you think a car is beautiful straight away and then over time its appeal will fade. It’s too obviously pretty, or bland.

But I’m not sure I buy this. Wasn’t the Aston Martin DB9 immediately a stunner? To my eyes, it still is. Wasn’t the Porsche Cayenne a gomper at birth? And I’m afraid I’d still swipe left if its mug appeared on Tinder.

Besides, isn’t life challenging enough? Earlier today, I spent an hour typing one-handed on a train that had standing room only in its four (clearly too few) carriages. My motorbike insurance renewal was just offered to me with a 67% price hike, necessitating a drudge through comparison websites.

The new policy documents tell me it will automatically renew, which I didn’t ask for and was given no option to opt out of; remembering this will be another drain on my inadequate mental capacity. Four members of my family have been in hospital in the past three months. 

The road surface is failing outside my house. My local council has launched another survey about planning, which I will fill out, even while knowing the council will ignore the views of the majority of residents.

The book Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness introduces a theory called Sludge. It refers to any kind of friction that impedes your life: those hours you spend on hold to a call centre; the hidden fees; the small print; the appeals you must go through when you get an erroneous parking ticket (my family have had three in a year, all overturned when I’ve appealed them, but by gum it’s tiring).

I am an exceptionally fortunate man with an easy and comfortable life, good health, a loving family and a wonderful job. Yet even I can get exhausted by the system. The sludge.

This, clearly, is not a car designer’s fault, but into this melee, this strife, why introduce more challenge when it could take us out of it?

The good people at Morgan think of their cars as escapism, something to get us away from the toil, the ball-ache and the drama of life.

I appreciate that making a challenging-looking car doesn’t stop people buying one, because Porsche’s long-running best-seller illustrates that. But I’m tired of my eyes being challenged. I want them to light up like

I’ve just seen a dog with its head poking out of a car window. What’s so bad about making beautiful cars?

< Prev    of 6895   Next >
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
Click on me to change image  * Enter verification code (Click on the CAPTCHA to refresh the image!)
* - Reqiured fields