Recent Updates

 

03/08/2025 12:00 PM

How aerodynamics have moved cars forward in the past 25 years

 

03/06/2025 12:00 PM

Motability takes £565 million blow as costs soar

 

03/06/2025 12:00 PM

Volkswagen reintroducing physical controls for vital functions

 

03/06/2025 12:00 AM

Volkswagen ID Every1 previews £17k city car for 2027

 

03/06/2025 12:00 AM

Does the £17k Volkswagen ID 1 really represent progress?

 

03/05/2025 12:00 PM

Exclusive Jaguar interview: fresh details on 986bhp super-GT

 

03/05/2025 12:00 PM

Ripping up Jaguar history would be 'big mistake', says brand boss

 

03/05/2025 12:00 PM

Jaguar rebrand 'played out' despite 'frustrating' response

 

03/05/2025 12:00 PM

Alpine A390 crossover pictured for first time ahead of May reveal

 

03/05/2025 12:00 PM

BMW iX

<<    10   11   12   13   14   >>

EV, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Solar & more 21st century mobility!

< Prev    of 6173   Next >
Mazda CX-30
Wednesday, Mar 05, 2025 12:00 AM
mazda cx30 rt 2025 front corner jh 31 'No replacement for displacement' is the thinking behind this compact crossover hatchback Volume car makers no longer seem to believe that bigger-capacity combustion engines have any place in smaller cars. Save, perhaps, for one.Always an advocate of a sophisticated, multi-solution approach to decarbonisation, Mazda has been quietly running in the opposite direction to many of its peers when it comes to powertrain strategy. In 2022, it introduced a medium-sized SUV, the Mazda CX-60, with a brand-new, six-cylinder turbo diesel engine. And the same year, when rivals were announcing three-cylinder turbo alternatives, it added a 2.5-litre four-cylinder atmospheric petrol option to its big-selling Mazda CX-5.Now, as part of a continued initiative of ‘engine right-sizing’, it has replaced a 2.0-litre unit with that same 2.5 in the nose of both the Mazda 3 hatchback and the closely related Mazda CX-30 crossover.It’s the latter we’re looking at here, a car that has also just had some minor equipment upgrades for 2025. Can it possibly make sense to continue to ignore forced induction, then, and go large on cubic capacity in a car like this?
< Prev    of 6173   Next >
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
Click on me to change image  * Enter verification code (Click on the CAPTCHA to refresh the image!)
* - Reqiured fields