Recent Updates

 

01/27/2024 12:00 AM

BMW X5

 

01/27/2024 12:00 AM

Lexus RZ 2024 long-term test

 

01/26/2024 12:00 AM

New Audi RS5 estate set to rival AMG C63 with hybrid V6

 

01/26/2024 12:00 AM

Toyota GR Yaris gains two WRC-inspired special editions

 

01/25/2024 12:00 PM

McLaren Artura 2023 long-term test

 

01/25/2024 12:00 PM

Tesla plans to build sub £25,000 'Redwood' EV in 2025

 

01/25/2024 12:00 PM

Plan to push back MOTs to every two years shelved by government

 

01/25/2024 12:00 AM

Nissan Qashqai

 

01/24/2024 12:00 PM

My Week In Cars: New Steve Cropley/Matt Prior podcast (ep. 72)

 

01/24/2024 12:00 PM

Clean air zones: all you need to know

<<    126   127   128   129   130   >>

EV, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Solar & more 21st century mobility!

< Prev    of 5619   Next >
Plan to push back MOTs to every two years shelved by government
Thursday, Jan 25, 2024 12:00 PM
mot garage 6663
The government wanted to move initial test back to four years, with less frequent checks thereafter
The proposal came amid the growing popularity of hybrid and electric cars and new vehicle technology

MOT tests will remain unchanged following a year-long review that could have extended them to once every two years and a vehicle’s first test to four years, the government has today announced.

The proposal had been part of making the test “fit for the future”, with ministers claiming it would not impact road safety due to "major developments in vehicle technology" while also saving UK motorists a combined £100 million per year in fees. 

According to government analysis, the number of casualties in car collisions due to "vehicle defects" has remained low. 

This sparked heavy debate from motoring groups, such as the AA and the RAC, which claimed axing annual tests would “put lives at risk” because it would “likely increase the number of unroadworthy vehicles on our roads”. 

Both motoring bodies warned against the extension of a first MOT to four years, saying that brakes and tyres – especially on high-mileage cars – often need repairs after three and that “one in 10 cars fail their first MOT”.

In response to the criticism, the government has climbed down from its proposals. Roads minister Guy Opperman said: “We have listened to drivers and industry, and keeping MOTs in their current form shows once again that we are on the side of motorists.”

As part of the announcement, the government also confirmed it would now look to “modernise” the test, including to make it fit for electric and autonomous vehicles.

Among the proposals are more effective tests for diesel particulate emissions, improving or altering MOTs for electric vehicles (such as battery tests) and the transfer of some larger zero-emission vans to more standard, car-style testing.

"Ensuring the MOT remains fit for the future is a key part of DVSA’s work, and getting ready for new technology will help keep Britain's roads safe,” said Neil Barlow, head of vehicle policy at Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA).

The news was welcomed by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), the industry group that represents thousands of members across the country.

SMMT chief Mike Hawes said: “Government and the automotive industry have worked together to ensure the UK has some of the world’s safest roads. The decision to retain the existing MOT system is the right one.

“With vehicle technology continuing to evolve at pace in terms of both safety and environmental performance, we will maintain this collaboration with government and other stakeholders so that the MOT continues to be fit for purpose, helping Britain improve what is already a strong road safety record.”

The RAC agreed. Head of policy Simon Williams said: “It’s great news the madcap idea of changing the MOT from every year to every two has finally been consigned to the bin. 

“This would have seriously compromised road safety and ended up costing drivers more money rather than less as it was supposed to do, due to dangerous issues going undetected and getting progressively worse. This is why the idea was so widely unpopular with the motoring public in our research.”

< Prev    of 5619   Next >
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
Click on me to change image  * Enter verification code (Click on the CAPTCHA to refresh the image!)
* - Reqiured fields