Recent Updates

 

10/30/2025 12:00 PM

New Corolla will get FCEV as Toyota 'fully committed' to hydrogen

 

10/30/2025 12:00 AM

Government could scrap planning permission for EV charging gullies

 

10/30/2025 12:00 AM

503bhp Mazda is rotary-electric vision of ‘carbon-negative’ ICE

 

10/30/2025 12:00 AM

Mazda previews supermini comeback with ‘empathetic’ 2 successor

 

10/30/2025 12:00 AM

WATCH: Most important new cars of the Tokyo motor show 2025

 

10/29/2025 12:00 PM

Honda E replacement UK-bound as tiny EV with 'manual' gearbox

 

10/29/2025 12:00 PM

Lexus LS reinvented as wild six-wheel MPV to rival Bentayga

 

10/29/2025 12:00 PM

Toyota launches Century as new luxury brand with Conti GT rival

 

10/29/2025 12:00 PM

Mazda channels spirit of the 2 with quirky new supermini

 

10/29/2025 12:00 PM

Mazda reveals 503bhp sports saloon concept with rotary-EV power

<<    20   21   22   23   24   >>

EV, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Solar & more 21st century mobility!

< Prev    of 7345   Next >
Mazda CX-30
Wednesday, Mar 05, 2025 12:00 AM
mazda cx30 rt 2025 front corner jh 31 'No replacement for displacement' is the thinking behind this compact crossover hatchback Volume car makers no longer seem to believe that bigger-capacity combustion engines have any place in smaller cars. Save, perhaps, for one.Always an advocate of a sophisticated, multi-solution approach to decarbonisation, Mazda has been quietly running in the opposite direction to many of its peers when it comes to powertrain strategy. In 2022, it introduced a medium-sized SUV, the Mazda CX-60, with a brand-new, six-cylinder turbo diesel engine. And the same year, when rivals were announcing three-cylinder turbo alternatives, it added a 2.5-litre four-cylinder atmospheric petrol option to its big-selling Mazda CX-5.Now, as part of a continued initiative of ‘engine right-sizing’, it has replaced a 2.0-litre unit with that same 2.5 in the nose of both the Mazda 3 hatchback and the closely related Mazda CX-30 crossover.It’s the latter we’re looking at here, a car that has also just had some minor equipment upgrades for 2025. Can it possibly make sense to continue to ignore forced induction, then, and go large on cubic capacity in a car like this?
< Prev    of 7345   Next >
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
Click on me to change image  * Enter verification code (Click on the CAPTCHA to refresh the image!)
* - Reqiured fields