Recent Updates

 

10/16/2025 12:00 AM

£1500 off Volkswagen ID 4 and ID 5 as SUVs land Electric Car Grant

 

10/15/2025 12:00 PM

Autocar podcast: from the inside of a Hyundai!

 

10/15/2025 12:00 PM

Jeep Wrangler long-term test: 16,000 miles in a hardcore off-roader

 

10/15/2025 12:00 PM

UK government funding brings Toyota's Ami closer to production

 

10/15/2025 12:00 PM

Subaru to reveal STI hot hatch concepts at Tokyo motor show

 

10/15/2025 12:00 AM

Alfa Romeo Tonale facelift brings new 187bhp PHEV

 

10/15/2025 12:00 AM

Toyota C-HR+

 

10/14/2025 12:00 PM

Van makers slam 'financially lethal' European emissions targets

 

10/14/2025 12:00 PM

Volkswagen W12: The wild supercar that walked so Bugatti could run

 

10/14/2025 12:00 PM

New Mercedes S-Class coupe concept channels Gullwing

<<    28   29   30   31   32   >>

EV, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Solar & more 21st century mobility!

< Prev    of 7349   Next >
Mazda CX-30
Wednesday, Mar 05, 2025 12:00 AM
mazda cx30 rt 2025 front corner jh 31 'No replacement for displacement' is the thinking behind this compact crossover hatchback Volume car makers no longer seem to believe that bigger-capacity combustion engines have any place in smaller cars. Save, perhaps, for one.Always an advocate of a sophisticated, multi-solution approach to decarbonisation, Mazda has been quietly running in the opposite direction to many of its peers when it comes to powertrain strategy. In 2022, it introduced a medium-sized SUV, the Mazda CX-60, with a brand-new, six-cylinder turbo diesel engine. And the same year, when rivals were announcing three-cylinder turbo alternatives, it added a 2.5-litre four-cylinder atmospheric petrol option to its big-selling Mazda CX-5.Now, as part of a continued initiative of ‘engine right-sizing’, it has replaced a 2.0-litre unit with that same 2.5 in the nose of both the Mazda 3 hatchback and the closely related Mazda CX-30 crossover.It’s the latter we’re looking at here, a car that has also just had some minor equipment upgrades for 2025. Can it possibly make sense to continue to ignore forced induction, then, and go large on cubic capacity in a car like this?
< Prev    of 7349   Next >
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
Click on me to change image  * Enter verification code (Click on the CAPTCHA to refresh the image!)
* - Reqiured fields