Recent Updates

 

10/26/2025 12:00 AM

Citroen e-C3 long-term review: should the Renault 5 be worried?

 

10/26/2025 12:00 AM

"Collectors take note": Just six months left to order an Alpine A110

 

10/26/2025 12:00 AM

Ferrari 296 Speciale

 

10/26/2025 12:00 AM

WATCH: We drive the wild new Ferrari 296 Speciale

 

10/26/2025 12:00 AM

The longest road tunnels in the world

 

10/26/2025 12:00 AM

BMW vs Ineos vs Morgan: the link between three very different cars

 

10/26/2025 12:00 AM

The Lotus Evija's mad torque tech is the holy grail of EV engineering

 

10/23/2025 12:00 PM

The Citroen XM is the most unusual £5000 car you can buy

 

10/23/2025 12:00 PM

Nio shocks with fully active suspension - but how does it work?

 

10/23/2025 12:00 PM

Chery Tiggo 9: 422bhp, seven-seat PHEV offers 91-mile EV range for £43k

<<    24   25   26   27   28   >>

EV, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Solar & more 21st century mobility!

< Prev    of 7349   Next >
Mazda CX-30
Wednesday, Mar 05, 2025 12:00 AM
mazda cx30 rt 2025 front corner jh 31 'No replacement for displacement' is the thinking behind this compact crossover hatchback Volume car makers no longer seem to believe that bigger-capacity combustion engines have any place in smaller cars. Save, perhaps, for one.Always an advocate of a sophisticated, multi-solution approach to decarbonisation, Mazda has been quietly running in the opposite direction to many of its peers when it comes to powertrain strategy. In 2022, it introduced a medium-sized SUV, the Mazda CX-60, with a brand-new, six-cylinder turbo diesel engine. And the same year, when rivals were announcing three-cylinder turbo alternatives, it added a 2.5-litre four-cylinder atmospheric petrol option to its big-selling Mazda CX-5.Now, as part of a continued initiative of ‘engine right-sizing’, it has replaced a 2.0-litre unit with that same 2.5 in the nose of both the Mazda 3 hatchback and the closely related Mazda CX-30 crossover.It’s the latter we’re looking at here, a car that has also just had some minor equipment upgrades for 2025. Can it possibly make sense to continue to ignore forced induction, then, and go large on cubic capacity in a car like this?
< Prev    of 7349   Next >
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
Click on me to change image  * Enter verification code (Click on the CAPTCHA to refresh the image!)
* - Reqiured fields